• Graduate Program
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Deep Learning
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
  • Alumni

De Palma, A. and Rouwendal, J. (1996). Availability constraints in the housing market Journal of Housing Economics, 5(2):105--132.


  • Journal
    Journal of Housing Economics

This paper studies allocation of the housing market by means of discrete choice models with availability constraints. This approach arises when uncertainty about the availability of some alternatives is introduced within the conventional framework of discrete choice models. Availability constraints may exist, for instance, because of a lack of transparency in the market, limitations on the supply side, or rent control associated with centralized housing distribution. If households experience availability constraints, they may react by waiting until the desired alternative becomes available or by switching to a second best alternative. Both reactions affect the observed choice probabilities and have to be taken into account in econometric work. These implications of availability constraints are pointed out in this paper. An empirical application concerns the regulated rental part of the Dutch housing market. We find evidence for the presence of availability constraints and second best choices and conclude that an analysis based on conventional discrete choice models may lead to biased results.