• Graduate Program
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Deep Learning
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
  • Alumni

Chung, B., Franses, P.H. and Pennings, E. (2023). Conditions that make ventures thrive: from individual entrepreneur to innovation impact Small Business Economics, 62(3):1177--1200.


  • Journal
    Small Business Economics

Entrepreneurship and innovation create a positive impact on the economy and society. Globally, governments invest resources to support new ventures and facilitate innovation. In this study, we examine this phenomenon by studying the pathway that goes from individual entrepreneur to innovation impact. We measure the effect of entrepreneurial motives on different types of innovations, with a particular focus on its amplification by formal and informal institutional conditions. Specifically, we use multi-level models to analyze annual data of 29 countries for 2006 to 2018. We find that opportunity-driven entrepreneurs are associated with higher levels of radical innovation, breakthrough innovation, and disruptive innovation. Better tax policies and less bureaucracy amplify this positive effect on radical innovation and breakthrough innovation. For necessity-driven entrepreneurs, the regulatory quality amplifies the positive effect on radical innovation and disruptive innovation, while monetary resources dampen this effect. Our findings show that the differences in innovation impact can be explained by differences in entrepreneurial motives and their specific interactions with formal and informal institutional conditions.