• Graduate Program
    • Why study Business Data Science?
    • Research Master Business Data Science
    • Admissions
    • Facilities
    • Browse our Courses
    • PhD Vacancies
    • PhD Placements
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • News
  • Alumni

Coerts, M., Heine, F., van Ommeren, F. and van Witteloostuijn, A. (2027). Single and multi-winner auctions with performance obligation Games and Economic Behavior, 161.


  • Journal
    Games and Economic Behavior

Auctioning access rights to private providers through competitive tendering has become a central instrument for governments to regulate markets and public services. While efficient in allocating licenses, such auctions may generate monopolistic market structures with adverse effects on consumer welfare. We experimentally evaluate two policy interventions to mitigate these outcomes: introducing post-tender competition and imposing minimum production obligations on winning firms. Our results show that performance obligations substantially improve welfare by raising output and consumer surplus, albeit at the cost of reduced auction revenue. Extending the design with additional treatments, we demonstrate that genuine competition yields even stronger welfare gains. These findings highlight a trade-off between government revenue and consumer welfare in auction design. We conclude that while obligations are an effective tool to counter monopoly distortions, sustaining competition remains essential to maximise total surplus at the market level.