• Graduate Program
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Deep Learning
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
  • Alumni

Gryglewicz, S., Hartman-Glaser, B. and Zheng, G. (2020). Growth Options, Incentives, and Pay-for-Performance: Theory and Evidence Management Science, 66(3):1248--1277.


  • Journal
    Management Science

Pay{\textendash}performance sensitivity is a common proxy for the strength of incentives. We show that growth options create a wedge between expected-pay{\textendash}effort sensitivity, which determines actual incentives, and pay{\textendash}performance sensitivity, which is the ratio of expected-pay{\textendash}effort to performance{\textendash}effort sensitivity. An increase in growth option intensity can increase performance{\textendash}effort sensitivity more than expected-pay{\textendash}effort sensitivity so that, as incentives increase, pay{\textendash}performance sensitivity decreases. We document empirical evidence consistent with this finding. Pay{\textendash}performance sensitivity, measured by dollar changes in manager wealth over dollar changes in firm value, decreases with proxies for growth option intensity and increases with proxies for growth option exercise.