• Graduate Program
  • Research
  • Browse our Courses
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events Archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • News
  • Summer School
    • Deep Learning
    • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
    • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
    • Marketing Research with Purpose
    • Modern Toolbox for Spatial and Functional Data
    • Sustainable Finance
  • Alumni

Kok, L., van Eijkel, R., Koning, P. and Lammers, M. (2026). Assessing the Effects of Reduced Access to Income Support for Disabled Young Adults De Economist, 174(1):29--58.


  • Journal
    De Economist

We examine the effects of the loss of income support for young adults with a work disability on employment, income, health outcomes, personal debts and criminal behaviour. Our identification strategy uses a 2015 policy reform that drastically restricted access to income support for disabled young adults in the Netherlands (DIYA). Using a fuzzy regression discontinuity (RD) approach that exploits the birth-date cutoff date for new applicant cohorts, we find that the policy change caused the gross income of young disabled adults to decrease by €4,524 per year. The withdrawal of income support payments, amounting to around €10,000 per year, was partly compensated by increased income from welfare benefits (30%) and a higher income from wage earnings (32%). Particularly women experienced a strong reduction, their annual total gross income decreased by €6,012. Based on subgroup analyses of singles and partners, we find suggestive evidence that within-household gender norms are an important driver of this difference. The loss of income support did not significantly affect medical expenditures, personal debts or criminal behaviour.