• Graduate Program
    • Why study Business Data Science?
    • Research Master
    • Admissions
    • Courses
    • Course Registration
    • Facilities
    • PhD Vacancies
  • Summer School
  • Research
  • News
  • Events
    • Events Calendar
    • Events archive
    • Tinbergen Institute Lectures
    • Summer School
      • Deep Learning
      • Economics of Blockchain and Digital Currencies
      • Foundations of Machine Learning with Applications in Python
      • Machine Learning for Business
      • Marketing Research with Purpose
      • Sustainable Finance
      • Tuition Fees and Payment
      • Tinbergen Institute Summer School Program
    • Annual Tinbergen Institute Conference archive
  • Alumni
  • Magazine
Home | Events Archive | Let’s agree to disagree: Mutual fund holdings-based disagreement and the time series of stock returns
Research Master Pre-Defense

Let’s agree to disagree: Mutual fund holdings-based disagreement and the time series of stock returns


  • Speaker
    Marton Ligeti
  • Location
    Tinbergen - 1.02
    Amsterdam
  • Date and time

    July 07, 2025
    14:00 - 15:00

We propose a new measure of investor disagreement on the market factor based on US asset allocation fund portfolio data. Compared to disagreement metrics based on, e.g., analyst forecasts, our measure has the advantages of (1) capturing revealed, rather than stated, investor preferences and (2) being invariant to disagreement on stock-specific risks and expressing only the systematic component. Our results show that the dispersion, and not the mean level, of total equity weights among funds with a market timing objective significantly and positively (negatively) predicts excess market returns (Treasury returns) over the next quarter both in and out of sample and contains information that is not spanned by commonly used predictors. In fact, holdings-based disagreement is the best out-of-sample predictor for both the equity risk premium and Treasury returns, and it is the only variable in our sample that can explain the joint dynamics. This is consistent with a model of priced difference-of-opinion risk on equities, for which investors demand compensation, and for which Treasuries are a hedge.